Greetings Vineet,

It is really sad to see responses such as this, especially from someone who appears to be knowledgeable and write on technology related issues.

As you have seen in the article, I have performed no plagiarism at all. In the part where I explain Q learning, I used the most common example which you are going to find in most courses/articles out there (the robot maze).

Reading different articles on how to explain it best, I found the one which I have repeatedly said in my article I have used to illustrate the example (both in the beginning and under the pictures), clearly stating the origin.

I found it to be intuitive and easy to understand by someone who is not proficient in technology, as a means of providing my readers with a short intro on what I will be using.

As far as the trading part is concerned, the code was not thoroughly analyzed (in contrast to all other articles I have written), as a Google Forms survey I conducted on AI Monopoly's telegram group chat clearly showed that a large number of people are not interested in explaining the code within the article as it makes it tiring and lengthily, and to simply attach my Google Collab notebook.

It is really saddening that people like you exist as you simply illustrate the toxicity within the space and want to find an audience where there is none for you.

Best Regards,

Filippos